Disclaimer:
This post is not related to football.
This past
week, my command attended a town hall event hosted by the Commanding
General. The purpose of the event was for the general to address comments
he read in a recent command climate survey which was completed by active duty
and civilian personnel assigned to the unit. The typical format for these
town hall events is that the speaker speaks for however long they choose and
then they field questions. Of course,
because attending these events is mandatory for unfirmed personnel, we normally
just sit there until we are released and go back to work. As such, the speaker is usually met by a long
awkward pause when they ask “does anybody have any questions”? The Marines usually leave thinking that the
event was a waste of time and they think nothing of it again.
This time
the general wanted to avoid the awkward silence and actually have a dialog with
the audience. For this event, he and his
staff used a new app for the first time that allowed the audience members to
ask questions anonymously. The audience
simply had to use their smartphones to visit a website and then type in an
event specific code that gave access to the questions that were posted. The audience could then read other people’s
questions and vote for them. Upon
completion of the speaking portion, the general addressed the questions that
had the most votes.
When the
instructions were given prior to the beginning of the speaking portion, I thought
that it would be a dud and that the result would be the same, nobody would
enter any questions. To my surprise, a
lot of people were entering their questions.
Of course, I thought that any excuse to look at the phone instead of the
speaker would be taken advantage of. In
this instance I was wrong. The audience,
primarily the civilian employees, asked a lot of difficult and important
questions.
What I learned
from this experience is that communication can be effectively done without an
orator knowing which exact individual asked a question. Although asked by an individual, the answers
were for the collective. Lastly, I
thought it was a good bit of leadership for an old general to try new technology
for the sake of improved communication.
Comments
Post a Comment